SigmaBanc

Victims have reported SigmaBanc through Telegram channel testimonials. The case is classified as a NFT minting drainer and was opened on the SARFund registry once corroboration thresholds were met.

Common across the case file: operators blocked withdrawal requests and required upfront deposits routed through obscure custodial wallets. These behaviours, combined with demanded “tax” or “verification” fees before withdrawal, are the basis on which SARFund classified the platform as a verified scam broker.

Channels through which SigmaBanc has been reported include Telegram channel testimonials, direct victim submissions through SARFund, and Google Search complaints. SARFund cross-references new submissions against existing reports before adding evidence to the case file.

What victims should do

If you deposited funds with this platform, file a claim with SARFund as soon as possible. Provide transaction hashes, wallet addresses, deposit dates, and any communication with the operator (Telegram, WhatsApp, email). The fresher the evidence, the higher the chance of a successful trace.

Why details on this case stay redacted

The Recovery Partner field, victim count, and traced-wallet figures are masked on the public registry. This is deliberate: publishing partner identities or live victim counts compromises tracing operations and tips off counterparties. Verified claimants receive the partner contact privately after submitting evidence.

Suspect you were affected by SigmaBanc? Submit your claim evidence and SARFund will route it to the partner working this case. No upfront fees, no obligation, no recovery guarantee — just verification and coordination.

SARFund does not guarantee recovery. All recovery actions are conducted by independent partners. Submission is free. SARFund is an intermediary case registry, not a recovery firm.