Victims have reported SeaStock24 through Facebook group reports. The case is classified as a clone-of-a-real-exchange front and was opened on the SARFund registry once corroboration thresholds were met.

The reports cluster around three operational signatures: the platform blocked withdrawal requests, rebranded under multiple domains in succession, and operated through impersonated KYC documents. SARFund treats this combination as sufficient grounds to maintain an active case file pending recovery action.

Reports have surfaced via Facebook group reports and TrustPilot complaints, with corroborating threads on direct victim submissions through SARFund. Victim accounts converge on identical timelines and identical withdrawal-blockade tactics.

What victims should do

If you deposited funds with this platform, file a claim with SARFund as soon as possible. Provide transaction hashes, wallet addresses, deposit dates, and any communication with the operator (Telegram, WhatsApp, email). The fresher the evidence, the higher the chance of a successful trace.

Why details on this case stay redacted

The Recovery Partner field, victim count, and traced-wallet figures are masked on the public registry. This is deliberate: publishing partner identities or live victim counts compromises tracing operations and tips off counterparties. Verified claimants receive the partner contact privately after submitting evidence.

If you deposited with SeaStock24, your case may already be on file. Submit your evidence to be matched and connected privately with the recovery team handling this matter.

SARFund does not guarantee recovery. All recovery actions are conducted by independent partners. Submission is free. SARFund is an intermediary case registry, not a recovery firm.