BitFinancial

BitFinancial is recorded on the SARFund database as a reported clone-of-a-real-exchange front. The case is currently in pending disbursement and has been assigned for coordination with the recovery counsel handling this matter.

The reports cluster around three operational signatures: the platform blocked withdrawal requests, rebranded under multiple domains in succession, and operated through impersonated KYC documents. SARFund treats this combination as sufficient grounds to maintain an active case file pending recovery action.

Reports have surfaced via Reddit victim threads and TrustPilot complaints, with corroborating threads on Telegram channel testimonials. Victim accounts converge on identical timelines and identical withdrawal-blockade tactics.

What evidence helps most

Transaction hashes (the on-chain proof of your deposit), screenshots of the broker dashboard, KYC documents you submitted, and full conversation history with any account manager. These four pieces let the partner build a defensible chain of custody.

Why details on this case stay redacted

The Recovery Partner field, victim count, and traced-wallet figures are masked on the public registry. This is deliberate: publishing partner identities or live victim counts compromises tracing operations and tips off counterparties. Verified claimants receive the partner contact privately after submitting evidence.

Suspect you were affected by BitFinancial? Submit your claim evidence and SARFund will route it to the partner working this case. No upfront fees, no obligation, no recovery guarantee — just verification and coordination.

SARFund does not guarantee recovery. All recovery actions are conducted by independent partners. Submission is free. SARFund is an intermediary case registry, not a recovery firm.