Firdex

SARFund tracks Firdex as an active investigation, with between 40 and 250 victims currently registered against the case. Evidence has been routed to the partner team conducting wallet tracing for verification and tracing.

The reports cluster around three operational signatures: the platform required upfront deposits routed through obscure custodial wallets, operated through impersonated KYC documents, and demanded “tax” or “verification” fees before withdrawal. SARFund treats this combination as sufficient grounds to maintain an active case file pending recovery action.

Reports have surfaced via direct victim submissions through SARFund and Facebook group reports, with corroborating threads on Google Search complaints. Victim accounts converge on identical timelines and identical withdrawal-blockade tactics.

What evidence helps most

Transaction hashes (the on-chain proof of your deposit), screenshots of the broker dashboard, KYC documents you submitted, and full conversation history with any account manager. These four pieces let the partner build a defensible chain of custody.

Why the recovery partner is masked

Listing the partner publicly creates two problems: it tips off perpetrators, who then accelerate fund-laundering, and it invites recovery-scam impersonators to clone the partner brand. Both happen often enough that masking is the only defensible default.

Suspect you were affected by Firdex? Submit your claim evidence and SARFund will route it to the partner working this case. No upfront fees, no obligation, no recovery guarantee — just verification and coordination.

SARFund does not guarantee recovery. All recovery actions are conducted by independent partners. Submission is free. SARFund is an intermediary case registry, not a recovery firm.