Caviex

The case file for Caviex aggregates complaints from multiple channels. Reports consistently identify the platform as a high-yield crypto investment platform built around the same playbook used by hundreds of related front-ends.

Common across the case file: operators used unregulated celebrity endorsements and rebranded under multiple domains in succession. These behaviours, combined with demanded “tax” or “verification” fees before withdrawal, are the basis on which SARFund classified the platform as a verified scam broker.

Channels through which Caviex has been reported include Facebook group reports, Google Search complaints, and TrustPilot complaints. SARFund cross-references new submissions against existing reports before adding evidence to the case file.

What evidence helps most

Transaction hashes (the on-chain proof of your deposit), screenshots of the broker dashboard, KYC documents you submitted, and full conversation history with any account manager. These four pieces let the partner build a defensible chain of custody.

Why the recovery partner is masked

Listing the partner publicly creates two problems: it tips off perpetrators, who then accelerate fund-laundering, and it invites recovery-scam impersonators to clone the partner brand. Both happen often enough that masking is the only defensible default.

Have transactions linked to Caviex? File a claim with the evidence checklist and SARFund will verify within 48 hours. We never charge to file and we never custody recovered funds.

SARFund does not guarantee recovery. All recovery actions are conducted by independent partners. Submission is free. SARFund is an intermediary case registry, not a recovery firm.