GBT

Victims have reported GBT through TrustPilot complaints. The case is classified as a high-yield crypto investment platform and was opened on the SARFund registry once corroboration thresholds were met.

The reports cluster around three operational signatures: the platform required upfront deposits routed through obscure custodial wallets, promised guaranteed returns, and used unregulated celebrity endorsements. SARFund treats this combination as sufficient grounds to maintain an active case file pending recovery action.

Channels through which GBT has been reported include TrustPilot complaints, Facebook group reports, and direct victim submissions through SARFund. SARFund cross-references new submissions against existing reports before adding evidence to the case file.

What evidence helps most

Transaction hashes (the on-chain proof of your deposit), screenshots of the broker dashboard, KYC documents you submitted, and full conversation history with any account manager. These four pieces let the partner build a defensible chain of custody.

Why details on this case stay redacted

The Recovery Partner field, victim count, and traced-wallet figures are masked on the public registry. This is deliberate: publishing partner identities or live victim counts compromises tracing operations and tips off counterparties. Verified claimants receive the partner contact privately after submitting evidence.

Have transactions linked to GBT? File a claim with the evidence checklist and SARFund will verify within 48 hours. We never charge to file and we never custody recovered funds.

SARFund does not guarantee recovery. All recovery actions are conducted by independent partners. Submission is free. SARFund is an intermediary case registry, not a recovery firm.