BITBinvest

Victims have reported BITBinvest through direct victim submissions through SARFund. The case is classified as a NFT minting drainer and was opened on the SARFund registry once corroboration thresholds were met.

Across the verified submissions, three red flags repeat: the broker demanded “tax” or “verification” fees before withdrawal, used unregulated celebrity endorsements, and promised guaranteed returns. None of these are unique to BITBinvest — they are the structural fingerprint of this scam typology.

Reports have surfaced via direct victim submissions through SARFund and Reddit victim threads, with corroborating threads on Telegram channel testimonials. Victim accounts converge on identical timelines and identical withdrawal-blockade tactics.

What evidence helps most

Transaction hashes (the on-chain proof of your deposit), screenshots of the broker dashboard, KYC documents you submitted, and full conversation history with any account manager. These four pieces let the partner build a defensible chain of custody.

Why details on this case stay redacted

The Recovery Partner field, victim count, and traced-wallet figures are masked on the public registry. This is deliberate: publishing partner identities or live victim counts compromises tracing operations and tips off counterparties. Verified claimants receive the partner contact privately after submitting evidence.

Suspect you were affected by BITBinvest? Submit your claim evidence and SARFund will route it to the partner working this case. No upfront fees, no obligation, no recovery guarantee — just verification and coordination.

SARFund does not guarantee recovery. All recovery actions are conducted by independent partners. Submission is free. SARFund is an intermediary case registry, not a recovery firm.