PJP Invest

Victims have reported PJP Invest through Facebook group reports. The case is classified as a clone-of-a-real-exchange front and was opened on the SARFund registry once corroboration thresholds were met.

The reports cluster around three operational signatures: the platform blocked withdrawal requests, operated through impersonated KYC documents, and rebranded under multiple domains in succession. SARFund treats this combination as sufficient grounds to maintain an active case file pending recovery action.

Reports have surfaced via Facebook group reports and Telegram channel testimonials, with corroborating threads on Reddit victim threads. Victim accounts converge on identical timelines and identical withdrawal-blockade tactics.

What evidence helps most

Transaction hashes (the on-chain proof of your deposit), screenshots of the broker dashboard, KYC documents you submitted, and full conversation history with any account manager. These four pieces let the partner build a defensible chain of custody.

Why the recovery partner is masked

Listing the partner publicly creates two problems: it tips off perpetrators, who then accelerate fund-laundering, and it invites recovery-scam impersonators to clone the partner brand. Both happen often enough that masking is the only defensible default.

Suspect you were affected by PJP Invest? Submit your claim evidence and SARFund will route it to the partner working this case. No upfront fees, no obligation, no recovery guarantee — just verification and coordination.

SARFund does not guarantee recovery. All recovery actions are conducted by independent partners. Submission is free. SARFund is an intermediary case registry, not a recovery firm.