Prime Coin

Victims have reported Prime Coin through TrustPilot complaints. The case is classified as a liquidity-mining ponzi and was opened on the SARFund registry once corroboration thresholds were met.

The reports cluster around three operational signatures: the platform required upfront deposits routed through obscure custodial wallets, used unregulated celebrity endorsements, and demanded “tax” or “verification” fees before withdrawal. SARFund treats this combination as sufficient grounds to maintain an active case file pending recovery action.

Reports have surfaced via TrustPilot complaints and direct victim submissions through SARFund, with corroborating threads on Telegram channel testimonials. Victim accounts converge on identical timelines and identical withdrawal-blockade tactics.

What evidence helps most

Transaction hashes (the on-chain proof of your deposit), screenshots of the broker dashboard, KYC documents you submitted, and full conversation history with any account manager. These four pieces let the partner build a defensible chain of custody.

Why details on this case stay redacted

The Recovery Partner field, victim count, and traced-wallet figures are masked on the public registry. This is deliberate: publishing partner identities or live victim counts compromises tracing operations and tips off counterparties. Verified claimants receive the partner contact privately after submitting evidence.

If you deposited with Prime Coin, your case may already be on file. Submit your evidence to be matched and connected privately with the recovery team handling this matter.

SARFund does not guarantee recovery. All recovery actions are conducted by independent partners. Submission is free. SARFund is an intermediary case registry, not a recovery firm.