RoboFX360

Victims have reported RoboFX360 through Facebook group reports. The case is classified as a NFT minting drainer and was opened on the SARFund registry once corroboration thresholds were met.

Across the verified submissions, three red flags repeat: the broker required upfront deposits routed through obscure custodial wallets, operated through impersonated KYC documents, and demanded “tax” or “verification” fees before withdrawal. None of these are unique to RoboFX360 — they are the structural fingerprint of this scam typology.

Channels through which RoboFX360 has been reported include Facebook group reports, TrustPilot complaints, and Quora question threads. SARFund cross-references new submissions against existing reports before adding evidence to the case file.

What evidence helps most

Transaction hashes (the on-chain proof of your deposit), screenshots of the broker dashboard, KYC documents you submitted, and full conversation history with any account manager. These four pieces let the partner build a defensible chain of custody.

Why the recovery partner is masked

Listing the partner publicly creates two problems: it tips off perpetrators, who then accelerate fund-laundering, and it invites recovery-scam impersonators to clone the partner brand. Both happen often enough that masking is the only defensible default.

Have transactions linked to RoboFX360? File a claim with the evidence checklist and SARFund will verify within 48 hours. We never charge to file and we never custody recovered funds.

SARFund does not guarantee recovery. All recovery actions are conducted by independent partners. Submission is free. SARFund is an intermediary case registry, not a recovery firm.