Victims have reported AAG Markets through TrustPilot complaints. The case is classified as a NFT minting drainer and was opened on the SARFund registry once corroboration thresholds were met.

Common across the case file: operators required upfront deposits routed through obscure custodial wallets and operated through impersonated KYC documents. These behaviours, combined with blocked withdrawal requests, are the basis on which SARFund classified the platform as a verified scam broker.

Public chatter on TrustPilot complaints, Reddit victim threads and Facebook group reports shows the same recurring complaint structure: deposits go in, dashboard “earnings” appear, withdrawal requests trigger fee demands, and contact eventually goes silent.

What evidence helps most

Transaction hashes (the on-chain proof of your deposit), screenshots of the broker dashboard, KYC documents you submitted, and full conversation history with any account manager. These four pieces let the partner build a defensible chain of custody.

Why the recovery partner is masked

Listing the partner publicly creates two problems: it tips off perpetrators, who then accelerate fund-laundering, and it invites recovery-scam impersonators to clone the partner brand. Both happen often enough that masking is the only defensible default.

If you deposited with AAG Markets, your case may already be on file. Submit your evidence to be matched and connected privately with the recovery team handling this matter.

SARFund does not guarantee recovery. All recovery actions are conducted by independent partners. Submission is free. SARFund is an intermediary case registry, not a recovery firm.