Victims have reported Alphas through TrustPilot complaints. The case is classified as a NFT minting drainer and was opened on the SARFund registry once corroboration thresholds were met.

Across the verified submissions, three red flags repeat: the broker operated through impersonated KYC documents, required upfront deposits routed through obscure custodial wallets, and demanded “tax” or “verification” fees before withdrawal. None of these are unique to Alphas — they are the structural fingerprint of this scam typology.

Reports have surfaced via TrustPilot complaints and Facebook group reports, with corroborating threads on direct victim submissions through SARFund. Victim accounts converge on identical timelines and identical withdrawal-blockade tactics.

What evidence helps most

Transaction hashes (the on-chain proof of your deposit), screenshots of the broker dashboard, KYC documents you submitted, and full conversation history with any account manager. These four pieces let the partner build a defensible chain of custody.

Why details on this case stay redacted

The Recovery Partner field, victim count, and traced-wallet figures are masked on the public registry. This is deliberate: publishing partner identities or live victim counts compromises tracing operations and tips off counterparties. Verified claimants receive the partner contact privately after submitting evidence.

Have transactions linked to Alphas? File a claim with the evidence checklist and SARFund will verify within 48 hours. We never charge to file and we never custody recovered funds.

SARFund does not guarantee recovery. All recovery actions are conducted by independent partners. Submission is free. SARFund is an intermediary case registry, not a recovery firm.