The case file for Bost Technology aggregates complaints from multiple channels. Reports consistently identify the platform as a liquidity-mining ponzi built around the same playbook used by hundreds of related front-ends.

Across the verified submissions, three red flags repeat: the broker used unregulated celebrity endorsements, required upfront deposits routed through obscure custodial wallets, and blocked withdrawal requests. None of these are unique to Bost Technology — they are the structural fingerprint of this scam typology.

Reports have surfaced via direct victim submissions through SARFund and Telegram channel testimonials, with corroborating threads on Reddit victim threads. Victim accounts converge on identical timelines and identical withdrawal-blockade tactics.

What evidence helps most

Transaction hashes (the on-chain proof of your deposit), screenshots of the broker dashboard, KYC documents you submitted, and full conversation history with any account manager. These four pieces let the partner build a defensible chain of custody.

Why details on this case stay redacted

The Recovery Partner field, victim count, and traced-wallet figures are masked on the public registry. This is deliberate: publishing partner identities or live victim counts compromises tracing operations and tips off counterparties. Verified claimants receive the partner contact privately after submitting evidence.

Have transactions linked to Bost Technology? File a claim with the evidence checklist and SARFund will verify within 48 hours. We never charge to file and we never custody recovered funds.

SARFund does not guarantee recovery. All recovery actions are conducted by independent partners. Submission is free. SARFund is an intermediary case registry, not a recovery firm.