Victims have reported Cmglobalmarket through Google Search complaints. The case is classified as a clone-of-a-real-exchange front and was opened on the SARFund registry once corroboration thresholds were met.

Across the verified submissions, three red flags repeat: the broker demanded “tax” or “verification” fees before withdrawal, rebranded under multiple domains in succession, and blocked withdrawal requests. None of these are unique to Cmglobalmarket — they are the structural fingerprint of this scam typology.

Public chatter on Google Search complaints, TrustPilot complaints and Reddit victim threads shows the same recurring complaint structure: deposits go in, dashboard “earnings” appear, withdrawal requests trigger fee demands, and contact eventually goes silent.

What evidence helps most

Transaction hashes (the on-chain proof of your deposit), screenshots of the broker dashboard, KYC documents you submitted, and full conversation history with any account manager. These four pieces let the partner build a defensible chain of custody.

Why the recovery partner is masked

Listing the partner publicly creates two problems: it tips off perpetrators, who then accelerate fund-laundering, and it invites recovery-scam impersonators to clone the partner brand. Both happen often enough that masking is the only defensible default.

If you deposited with Cmglobalmarket, your case may already be on file. Submit your evidence to be matched and connected privately with the recovery team handling this matter.

SARFund does not guarantee recovery. All recovery actions are conducted by independent partners. Submission is free. SARFund is an intermediary case registry, not a recovery firm.