Elbitrader has been flagged on the SARFund registry as a reported clone-of-a-real-exchange front. Victim submissions describe a familiar pattern: an initial small deposit that “performs”, followed by escalating top-ups and a final wall when withdrawal is requested.

The reports cluster around three operational signatures: the platform rebranded under multiple domains in succession, operated through impersonated KYC documents, and demanded “tax” or “verification” fees before withdrawal. SARFund treats this combination as sufficient grounds to maintain an active case file pending recovery action.

Reports have surfaced via direct victim submissions through SARFund and Facebook group reports, with corroborating threads on Google Search complaints. Victim accounts converge on identical timelines and identical withdrawal-blockade tactics.

What evidence helps most

Transaction hashes (the on-chain proof of your deposit), screenshots of the broker dashboard, KYC documents you submitted, and full conversation history with any account manager. These four pieces let the partner build a defensible chain of custody.

Redaction policy

SARFund publishes the existence and status of each case but withholds operationally sensitive details. The recovery partner identity, exact victim count, recovered amount, and tagged wallet addresses are released only to verified claimants once the claim form is submitted and matched.

Suspect you were affected by Elbitrader? Submit your claim evidence and SARFund will route it to the partner working this case. No upfront fees, no obligation, no recovery guarantee — just verification and coordination.

SARFund does not guarantee recovery. All recovery actions are conducted by independent partners. Submission is free. SARFund is an intermediary case registry, not a recovery firm.