The case file for ICG24 aggregates complaints from multiple channels. Reports consistently identify the platform as a liquidity-mining ponzi built around the same playbook used by hundreds of related front-ends.

Common across the case file: operators rebranded under multiple domains in succession and demanded “tax” or “verification” fees before withdrawal. These behaviours, combined with blocked withdrawal requests, are the basis on which SARFund classified the platform as a verified scam broker.

Channels through which ICG24 has been reported include TrustPilot complaints, direct victim submissions through SARFund, and Quora question threads. SARFund cross-references new submissions against existing reports before adding evidence to the case file.

What evidence helps most

Transaction hashes (the on-chain proof of your deposit), screenshots of the broker dashboard, KYC documents you submitted, and full conversation history with any account manager. These four pieces let the partner build a defensible chain of custody.

Why details on this case stay redacted

The Recovery Partner field, victim count, and traced-wallet figures are masked on the public registry. This is deliberate: publishing partner identities or live victim counts compromises tracing operations and tips off counterparties. Verified claimants receive the partner contact privately after submitting evidence.

Suspect you were affected by ICG24? Submit your claim evidence and SARFund will route it to the partner working this case. No upfront fees, no obligation, no recovery guarantee — just verification and coordination.

SARFund does not guarantee recovery. All recovery actions are conducted by independent partners. Submission is free. SARFund is an intermediary case registry, not a recovery firm.