The case file for Open Signal ltd aggregates complaints from multiple channels. Reports consistently identify the platform as a fake staking / yield platform built around the same playbook used by hundreds of related front-ends.

Across the verified submissions, three red flags repeat: the broker demanded “tax” or “verification” fees before withdrawal, blocked withdrawal requests, and required upfront deposits routed through obscure custodial wallets. None of these are unique to Open Signal ltd — they are the structural fingerprint of this scam typology.

Channels through which Open Signal ltd has been reported include direct victim submissions through SARFund, Quora question threads, and Telegram channel testimonials. SARFund cross-references new submissions against existing reports before adding evidence to the case file.

What evidence helps most

Transaction hashes (the on-chain proof of your deposit), screenshots of the broker dashboard, KYC documents you submitted, and full conversation history with any account manager. These four pieces let the partner build a defensible chain of custody.

Why details on this case stay redacted

The Recovery Partner field, victim count, and traced-wallet figures are masked on the public registry. This is deliberate: publishing partner identities or live victim counts compromises tracing operations and tips off counterparties. Verified claimants receive the partner contact privately after submitting evidence.

If you deposited with Open Signal ltd, your case may already be on file. Submit your evidence to be matched and connected privately with the recovery team handling this matter.

SARFund does not guarantee recovery. All recovery actions are conducted by independent partners. Submission is free. SARFund is an intermediary case registry, not a recovery firm.