Pocket Option is recorded on the SARFund database as a reported clone-of-a-real-exchange front. The case is currently in funds-recovered partial pool and has been assigned for coordination with the recovery counsel handling this matter.

Across the verified submissions, three red flags repeat: the broker operated through impersonated KYC documents, rebranded under multiple domains in succession, and demanded “tax” or “verification” fees before withdrawal. None of these are unique to Pocket Option — they are the structural fingerprint of this scam typology.

Channels through which Pocket Option has been reported include TrustPilot complaints, Telegram channel testimonials, and Quora question threads. SARFund cross-references new submissions against existing reports before adding evidence to the case file.

What evidence helps most

Transaction hashes (the on-chain proof of your deposit), screenshots of the broker dashboard, KYC documents you submitted, and full conversation history with any account manager. These four pieces let the partner build a defensible chain of custody.

Why details on this case stay redacted

The Recovery Partner field, victim count, and traced-wallet figures are masked on the public registry. This is deliberate: publishing partner identities or live victim counts compromises tracing operations and tips off counterparties. Verified claimants receive the partner contact privately after submitting evidence.

Suspect you were affected by Pocket Option? Submit your claim evidence and SARFund will route it to the partner working this case. No upfront fees, no obligation, no recovery guarantee — just verification and coordination.

SARFund does not guarantee recovery. All recovery actions are conducted by independent partners. Submission is free. SARFund is an intermediary case registry, not a recovery firm.