SARFund tracks Poolin as an active investigation, with between 40 and 250 victims currently registered against the case. Evidence has been routed to the recovery counsel handling this matter for verification and tracing.

Across the verified submissions, three red flags repeat: the broker required upfront deposits routed through obscure custodial wallets, operated through impersonated KYC documents, and rebranded under multiple domains in succession. None of these are unique to Poolin — they are the structural fingerprint of this scam typology.

Channels through which Poolin has been reported include direct victim submissions through SARFund, Quora question threads, and Facebook group reports. SARFund cross-references new submissions against existing reports before adding evidence to the case file.

What evidence helps most

Transaction hashes (the on-chain proof of your deposit), screenshots of the broker dashboard, KYC documents you submitted, and full conversation history with any account manager. These four pieces let the partner build a defensible chain of custody.

Why the recovery partner is masked

Listing the partner publicly creates two problems: it tips off perpetrators, who then accelerate fund-laundering, and it invites recovery-scam impersonators to clone the partner brand. Both happen often enough that masking is the only defensible default.

If you deposited with Poolin, your case may already be on file. Submit your evidence to be matched and connected privately with the recovery team handling this matter.

SARFund does not guarantee recovery. All recovery actions are conducted by independent partners. Submission is free. SARFund is an intermediary case registry, not a recovery firm.