The case file for Royal Grant aggregates complaints from multiple channels. Reports consistently identify the platform as a clone-of-a-real-exchange front built around the same playbook used by hundreds of related front-ends.

The reports cluster around three operational signatures: the platform blocked withdrawal requests, demanded “tax” or “verification” fees before withdrawal, and operated through impersonated KYC documents. SARFund treats this combination as sufficient grounds to maintain an active case file pending recovery action.

Reports have surfaced via Facebook group reports and Quora question threads, with corroborating threads on Google Search complaints. Victim accounts converge on identical timelines and identical withdrawal-blockade tactics.

Filing a claim

Submit your evidence through the SARFund claim form. You will receive a case reference within minutes, and your submission will be cross-checked against the existing case file within 48 hours. Once verified, you are connected privately with the recovery partner working this matter.

Why details on this case stay redacted

The Recovery Partner field, victim count, and traced-wallet figures are masked on the public registry. This is deliberate: publishing partner identities or live victim counts compromises tracing operations and tips off counterparties. Verified claimants receive the partner contact privately after submitting evidence.

If you deposited with Royal Grant, your case may already be on file. Submit your evidence to be matched and connected privately with the recovery team handling this matter.

SARFund does not guarantee recovery. All recovery actions are conducted by independent partners. Submission is free. SARFund is an intermediary case registry, not a recovery firm.