RSI Technology is recorded on the SARFund database as a reported liquidity-mining ponzi. The case is currently in pending disbursement and has been assigned for coordination with the recovery counsel handling this matter.

The reports cluster around three operational signatures: the platform operated through impersonated KYC documents, demanded “tax” or “verification” fees before withdrawal, and rebranded under multiple domains in succession. SARFund treats this combination as sufficient grounds to maintain an active case file pending recovery action.

Public chatter on TrustPilot complaints, Reddit victim threads and Quora question threads shows the same recurring complaint structure: deposits go in, dashboard “earnings” appear, withdrawal requests trigger fee demands, and contact eventually goes silent.

What evidence helps most

Transaction hashes (the on-chain proof of your deposit), screenshots of the broker dashboard, KYC documents you submitted, and full conversation history with any account manager. These four pieces let the partner build a defensible chain of custody.

Why the recovery partner is masked

Listing the partner publicly creates two problems: it tips off perpetrators, who then accelerate fund-laundering, and it invites recovery-scam impersonators to clone the partner brand. Both happen often enough that masking is the only defensible default.

Suspect you were affected by RSI Technology? Submit your claim evidence and SARFund will route it to the partner working this case. No upfront fees, no obligation, no recovery guarantee — just verification and coordination.

SARFund does not guarantee recovery. All recovery actions are conducted by independent partners. Submission is free. SARFund is an intermediary case registry, not a recovery firm.