The case file for Secure Insurance aggregates complaints from multiple channels. Reports consistently identify the platform as a NFT minting drainer built around the same playbook used by hundreds of related front-ends.

Common across the case file: operators required upfront deposits routed through obscure custodial wallets and used unregulated celebrity endorsements. These behaviours, combined with rebranded under multiple domains in succession, are the basis on which SARFund classified the platform as a verified scam broker.

Channels through which Secure Insurance has been reported include Facebook group reports, Reddit victim threads, and Quora question threads. SARFund cross-references new submissions against existing reports before adding evidence to the case file.

What evidence helps most

Transaction hashes (the on-chain proof of your deposit), screenshots of the broker dashboard, KYC documents you submitted, and full conversation history with any account manager. These four pieces let the partner build a defensible chain of custody.

Why details on this case stay redacted

The Recovery Partner field, victim count, and traced-wallet figures are masked on the public registry. This is deliberate: publishing partner identities or live victim counts compromises tracing operations and tips off counterparties. Verified claimants receive the partner contact privately after submitting evidence.

Suspect you were affected by Secure Insurance? Submit your claim evidence and SARFund will route it to the partner working this case. No upfront fees, no obligation, no recovery guarantee — just verification and coordination.

SARFund does not guarantee recovery. All recovery actions are conducted by independent partners. Submission is free. SARFund is an intermediary case registry, not a recovery firm.