Soslis is recorded on the SARFund database as a reported fake staking / yield platform. The case is currently in funds-recovered partial pool and has been assigned for coordination with the recovery counsel handling this matter.

Across the verified submissions, three red flags repeat: the broker required upfront deposits routed through obscure custodial wallets, operated through impersonated KYC documents, and demanded “tax” or “verification” fees before withdrawal. None of these are unique to Soslis — they are the structural fingerprint of this scam typology.

Channels through which Soslis has been reported include Reddit victim threads, Quora question threads, and direct victim submissions through SARFund. SARFund cross-references new submissions against existing reports before adding evidence to the case file.

What evidence helps most

Transaction hashes (the on-chain proof of your deposit), screenshots of the broker dashboard, KYC documents you submitted, and full conversation history with any account manager. These four pieces let the partner build a defensible chain of custody.

Why the recovery partner is masked

Listing the partner publicly creates two problems: it tips off perpetrators, who then accelerate fund-laundering, and it invites recovery-scam impersonators to clone the partner brand. Both happen often enough that masking is the only defensible default.

Suspect you were affected by Soslis? Submit your claim evidence and SARFund will route it to the partner working this case. No upfront fees, no obligation, no recovery guarantee — just verification and coordination.

SARFund does not guarantee recovery. All recovery actions are conducted by independent partners. Submission is free. SARFund is an intermediary case registry, not a recovery firm.