Victims have reported SRINVA through Facebook group reports. The case is classified as a signal-group pump scheme and was opened on the SARFund registry once corroboration thresholds were met.

Across the verified submissions, three red flags repeat: the broker demanded “tax” or “verification” fees before withdrawal, used unregulated celebrity endorsements, and rebranded under multiple domains in succession. None of these are unique to SRINVA — they are the structural fingerprint of this scam typology.

Channels through which SRINVA has been reported include Facebook group reports, Google Search complaints, and TrustPilot complaints. SARFund cross-references new submissions against existing reports before adding evidence to the case file.

What evidence helps most

Transaction hashes (the on-chain proof of your deposit), screenshots of the broker dashboard, KYC documents you submitted, and full conversation history with any account manager. These four pieces let the partner build a defensible chain of custody.

Why details on this case stay redacted

The Recovery Partner field, victim count, and traced-wallet figures are masked on the public registry. This is deliberate: publishing partner identities or live victim counts compromises tracing operations and tips off counterparties. Verified claimants receive the partner contact privately after submitting evidence.

Have transactions linked to SRINVA? File a claim with the evidence checklist and SARFund will verify within 48 hours. We never charge to file and we never custody recovered funds.

SARFund does not guarantee recovery. All recovery actions are conducted by independent partners. Submission is free. SARFund is an intermediary case registry, not a recovery firm.