Tradeopol is recorded on the SARFund database as a reported pig-butchering romance scam. The case is currently in multi-victim pooled review and has been assigned for coordination with the partner team conducting wallet tracing.

The reports cluster around three operational signatures: the platform used unregulated celebrity endorsements, rebranded under multiple domains in succession, and operated through impersonated KYC documents. SARFund treats this combination as sufficient grounds to maintain an active case file pending recovery action.

Public chatter on TrustPilot complaints, direct victim submissions through SARFund and Google Search complaints shows the same recurring complaint structure: deposits go in, dashboard “earnings” appear, withdrawal requests trigger fee demands, and contact eventually goes silent.

What evidence helps most

Transaction hashes (the on-chain proof of your deposit), screenshots of the broker dashboard, KYC documents you submitted, and full conversation history with any account manager. These four pieces let the partner build a defensible chain of custody.

Why the recovery partner is masked

Listing the partner publicly creates two problems: it tips off perpetrators, who then accelerate fund-laundering, and it invites recovery-scam impersonators to clone the partner brand. Both happen often enough that masking is the only defensible default.

Suspect you were affected by Tradeopol? Submit your claim evidence and SARFund will route it to the partner working this case. No upfront fees, no obligation, no recovery guarantee — just verification and coordination.

SARFund does not guarantee recovery. All recovery actions are conducted by independent partners. Submission is free. SARFund is an intermediary case registry, not a recovery firm.