The case file for Zoom-Bit (clone of FCA authorised firm) aggregates complaints from multiple channels. Reports consistently identify the platform as a recovery-scam impersonator built around the same playbook used by hundreds of related front-ends.

Common across the case file: operators promised guaranteed returns and operated through impersonated KYC documents. These behaviours, combined with blocked withdrawal requests, are the basis on which SARFund classified the platform as a verified scam broker.

Public chatter on TrustPilot complaints, Telegram channel testimonials and Google Search complaints shows the same recurring complaint structure: deposits go in, dashboard “earnings” appear, withdrawal requests trigger fee demands, and contact eventually goes silent.

What evidence helps most

Transaction hashes (the on-chain proof of your deposit), screenshots of the broker dashboard, KYC documents you submitted, and full conversation history with any account manager. These four pieces let the partner build a defensible chain of custody.

Why the recovery partner is masked

Listing the partner publicly creates two problems: it tips off perpetrators, who then accelerate fund-laundering, and it invites recovery-scam impersonators to clone the partner brand. Both happen often enough that masking is the only defensible default.

Suspect you were affected by Zoom-Bit (clone of FCA authorised firm)? Submit your claim evidence and SARFund will route it to the partner working this case. No upfront fees, no obligation, no recovery guarantee — just verification and coordination.

SARFund does not guarantee recovery. All recovery actions are conducted by independent partners. Submission is free. SARFund is an intermediary case registry, not a recovery firm.